Have you ever heard the story of when Ibn Arabi went to the market to buy some figs?
Hot and dusty, it was summer in Al-Anadalus. Seville, to be precise, which was after all the center of the world. Well, at least it was the greatest empire standing that far to the West during those Moorish times.
The largest and most prosperous land in Europe, water flowed through the city of Seville in countless canals; flowing water pouring out of countless fountains; there were great libraries and bath houses. It was a place where a philosopher could always find a job.
Walking toward one of the city's legendary markets, our young philosopher smiled in anticipation. He knew the future was bright and, though he was only sent to buy figs, he knew so much more awaited his senses. He could spend hours in the city markets-- in delight listening to people speaking in dozens of languages and catching in the wind the fragrance of fruit from the Levant and sweet sugar from Egypt; there were perfumed vinegars and syrups made from grapes. Wines. Cherries, endives, oranges, spicy sausage; dried fruit, dried fish, mint, orange blossoms and roses---cumin, peppers and of course saffron.
Just thinking about the perfume of these things caused him to quicken his pace. And, turning the corner into the narrow and covered streets which led to the market, for no reason whatsoever, our hero looked up.
It was at that precise moment that the woman had flung open the window of her bedroom. She needed air and so had spontaneously-- on a whim-- opened the window from her room on the second floor.
Not surprising-- given the story-- their eyes locked.
And as a thousand birds took flight in his heart, the woman stood there barely breathing. Time stopped. Too quickly, however, time started again as she heard someone in the house approaching her room (opening windows being something not encouraged in her world) she quickly shut the window and went back to her chores. Somehow, though, she felt absolutely sure that she would never be the same again.
Our hero, Ibn Arabi, by that time had started running- back in the direction from which he had come. Being the man he was-- even so young-- he sat down and immediately composed a love poem. And attaching it to a letter penned in almost impossible beauty, he had one of his servants deliver the sealed letter to her home. Of course, she knew at once it was from him.
Then, for precisely one year, every morning at precisely the same time, he would walk to the market to buy figs. And every morning, at precisely the same time, she would fling open her window. Their afternoons were consumed by the writing of love letters to each other.
And like the love letters they penned to each other, their desire too required an answer. "I will soon go mad if I cannot taste your lips," She actually said this (for we have the letter to prove it). To wait is to be enchanted... this being something that Medieval physicians declared could lead a person into madness (see Averroes' study of love as affliction)
Only a few of their letters survive today. A taste of what must have been pure intoxication, the two became quickly overwhelmed in a Sea of Love. Or so it seemed, at least. Scholars have tried to analyze their few surviving letters and the general consensus seems to be that she sought to make herself known to him. As he sought to know her.
I want to understand. I do understand. I understand, I understand
And so in this way, they circled each other-- like planets circling the sun; like dervishes circling God. In love, there is a great desire to be known by the Beloved. Just in the same way that the Beloved seeks to know the soul that he feels belongs to him. As the poets insist, true love is a great mirror reflecting one's soul at the same time reflecting the soul of the Beloved in unio mystica.
All of this being part of a playful game of hide-and-seek that God plays with Himself, says the hindu and sufi mystics. Perhaps no one in history worked out a theory for this like our young philosopher. Indeed, his theories on divine love made him famous throughout the Islamic world. Born 100 years before Dante, scholars posit that it was Ibn Arabi's poetry and philosophy which would inspire, illuminate and be reborn within Dante's poetry of Beatrice. Beatrice's Body. Beatrice's soul.
Stranger things have happened, I am sure you will agree. Ibn Arabi's theories of love-- born from their love letters-- became a dialectic of love, which itself became a religion of love, characterized by angel's wings and planets circling the sun (both images which came themselves straight out of their letters). Desire transfigured by imagination-- imagination, says Arabi being the function of the heart. As the brain thinks and body moves, so does heart imagine and desire. And this is expressed in the form of heavenly angels--their wings beating in desire, they leave feathers behind in bed.
**
When I think of them-- Lover and Beloved-- I cannot help but wonder what became of them. Well, I know what became of him, but what of the woman in the window? Her angel's wings beating in desire, I imagine sometimes that she did go mad from longing... falling in love, falling in despair, falling ill. Falling out of her window.
I wonder too whether people still fall in love in the same way. In times past, we know from poems and novels that people did fall in love precisely in the way described above. A veiled glimpse ignites a fire causing two people to circle each other as Lover desires Beloved; each seeking to know the Other. This all being something which took place within the landscape of the heart itself. It was something imagined-- over weeks upon weeks; months upon months. Imagined as "'spirits take bodies and bodies become spirits'"
People reported that like the other magical incantation-- abbracadbra-- that just whispering the words out loud "I-love-you" had the power to move mountains. It even had the power to cure gout. I wonder, looking at their letters, whether people are still capable of this i fedeli d'amore (or in this translation below) a "wondrous" Religion of Love.
"Wonder"
A garden among the flames!
My heart can take on any form:
A meadow for gazelles,
A cloister for monks,
For the idols, sacred ground,
Ka'ba for the circling pilgrim,
The tables of the Torah,
The scrolls of the Quran.
My creed is Love;
Wherever its caravan turns along the way,
That is my belief,
My faith.
Paintings by the great Farah Ossouli.
The idea of the romance created by star-crossed lovers exchanging letters in secret is far older than your story. And whose heart isn't captured by this idea of suspenseful romance? Who doesn't love the idea of being loved entirely for oneself - free of the constraints of life, daily realities and even the body? To love just the soul and only for the soul?
I suspect that is what heaven is.
But did the lovers ever meet? Did their love survive when they actually encountered one another? Did they walk off into the sunset? Are star crossed lovers really ever able to?
Or is it the heat and the magic of the elixir of the soul and imagination that cannot endure when diluted by reality? After all, no one knows if Romeo and Juliet's love would have made a happy life. When they stepped out of the small circle of their imagination - they died. The world killed them and they killed themselves.
Is Love in it's purest form the love of these letter writers? Or is it the Love of "The Notebook" in which people encounter each other, change their lives and die in each others' arms in their old age? Is it the love which comes easy and free, or the love that is earned? Is it fleeting love that burns so hot - or love that endures the tests of time and the harshness of life?
Do angels sing for all of these? Does God play hide and seek in the love that only two holocaust survivors can share?
What is sacred? What is pure? What brand of Love is the most beautiful? What is most real?
Posted by: Eric | January 08, 2010 at 07:19 PM
Who said they were star-crossed?
And the angels, for better or worse, I imagine sing for dante and beatrice, not for dante and the woman he actually married. Right?
Marriage and Love. They can be one and the same. Not on this blog though, my dear....
Posted by: Peony | January 08, 2010 at 07:24 PM
Of course they do not have to be the same. But on paper, with imagination engaged - do two people really fall in love with each other? Or is it the idea of each other? Or is it two characters? On paper we are who we want to be - we reveal only what we want and create what we wish to present. On paper are the lovers two whole people? Do they ever really fall in love with each other?
Posted by: Eric | January 08, 2010 at 07:36 PM
Eric, you have removed the "sacred" from love. That's fine.... but it is what happens when we conflate love with marriage. Or if we remove the old fashioned or anyway this very old idea of love as idea or love as mirror of the soul. Without imagination enagaged, can there be True Love?
And is married love more daunting? Yes. But it is categorically different, isn't it?
How is loving a person despire their flaws more incredible or more impressive then loving someone as Beloved? I imagine they are very different things and cannot be compared.
Shekure and Black had both. They started from poetic love and then moved to married love. In a book but still, there Romance and then married love reminded me of the ending scene in the book where Shekure tells her little boy Orhan that more than anything she desires two paintings of herself-- one painted in eternity, in the style of the Ottomans (depicting her Ideal Self) and the other one painted in time, in the style of the Venitians (depicting her enbodied self)
Posted by: Peony | January 08, 2010 at 07:46 PM
I'm just not convinced that letters and the love you describe are anything significantly different than infatuation with a character in a novel. Only the novel is interactive as the character returns a letter.
To truly experience Love, don't lovers have to experience each other's presence? The tactile quality of the soul? The energy we can feel across a room? Or up close to one another? To be in love with another - don't lovers have to stand before one another, unable to conceal their souls?
Posted by: Eric | January 08, 2010 at 07:59 PM
There are many kinds of love but no (NO) I do not place greater value or significance on Dante's Love for his real wife over his Love of Beatrice. I think they are different. Incomparable. And, do you really want to get me started on this idea of l'amour bourgeois as potential death of poetry, imagination, community and friendship? Not to mention the destruction of civiliation (just kidding) 笑!
Posted by: Petrach | January 08, 2010 at 08:12 PM
But there's nothing Bourgeois about love at first sight or even the thrill of a short romance. But a least you know the soul you're with. You have a real sense of a person in a way he or she cannot hide.
Sure, you can still project your fantasies upon the object of your love. Sure, you can pay attention to and even embellish some aspects of a person, and ignore others. But you can equally choose to notice and explore.
Moreover, in person, you can sense a person's soul. You can also see his or her manner, reactions, the lines of his or her face and the look in his or eyes.
On paper they are the character they present themselves as - not a complete person. And the angels are just hired actors with a script. Falling in love in this way is simply to romance and fall in love with one's self.
Posted by: Eric | January 08, 2010 at 10:33 PM
A woman slender, lissome, of fresh beauty,
For whom the heart of the sad lover is longing.
The assembly is lifted with fragrance at the mention of her,
And every tongue utters her name.
[Tarjuman]
Either Ibn el Arabi was Dante-esque or Dante was Ibn el Arabian, and even
the first possibility is thinkable among the Sufis who think that baraka can
flow backward in time. Mind you, there is also that Widow in the Window for
Dante, who appeared after Beatrice died?and scholars are still also
fantasizing about that relationship (“did anything happen?”) as about
Arabi’s great love.
Concerning the perennial grumblings re love v. marriage, I would offer this.
Love is to marriage as poetry is to philosophy. Now Ibn el Arabi was
unquestionably one of the greatest poets in the Arabic language, but he
blackened vast tomes with philosophical writings. But note this. All
through Arabi’s great works, his thought frequently and suddenly rises into
poetry, poetry permeates the prose, rises above it, refreshes it like
fountains?and that is the character of the great marriage too, mostly prose,
but sometimes…
And we mustn’t assume that it was all just longing, either:
She is the ease of whoever
burns for her,
transferring him from the levels
of mortal man
out of jealousy, lest her sparkle
be stained
by the turbidity
in the pools.
[Meccan Illuminations]
***
Posted by: Arsen | January 09, 2010 at 07:13 AM
Molto bello. Pope Ratzinger has already closed the doors to limbo despite his tweeting.
Posted by: fishintree | February 23, 2013 at 01:36 PM